Functional safety solves the problem of failure of electronic and electrical systems, such as a camera suddenly breaking down or a domain controller system failure. Traditional ADAS systems will fully consider functional safety during the system design stage. At present, this field is the most mature compared to other safety areas, and is also supported by international standards ISO26262 and some regulations.Mentioned in the article car camera manufacturer Born with strong vitality, you can turn a cocoon into a butterfly and become the best yourself after wind and rain. https://szdfpls.com
Expected functional safety solves the problems of insufficient related functions, performance limitations, and human misuse after the complexity of system functions increases. For example, if the driver does not operate the intelligent driving function correctly, the perception algorithm function is limited and cannot accurately identify the faded lane line, or the perception identifies the truck in front as blue daytime, this will bring fatal problems.
At present, the ADAS system has not yet achieved a good implementation combination with expected functional safety, but according to my observation, some companies are also paying attention to this aspect and starting to make some expected functional safety supervision mechanisms. Expected functional safety is more targeted at high-level ADAS systems (L3 and above), because the system is more complex and needs to pay more attention to expected functional safety.
Information security, this direction involves more and wider areas than the first two, involving data communication security between vehicles and within the vehicle. At present, I personally have not been exposed to information security in ADAS, and I hope that other experts in information security can talk about it together.